3 ms·
Yes indeed, but typically displaying a fullscreen HAM image takes up several seconds [0] of very visible scanline progress. This is pretty much instantaneous an
by krige 7y ago
Yes indeed, but typically displaying a fullscreen HAM image takes up several seconds [0] of very visible scanline progress. This is pretty much instantaneous and runs on even the base 68000 models, as long as they fulfill the memory requirement (which is admittedly rather hefty - 2MB chip and 8MB fast).
[0] example: https://youtu.be/Y9qzUbT_5Dk?t=95 https://youtu.be/Y9qzUbT_5Dk?t=95 timestamp and later on as well
- jacobush 7y agoThat’s just Deluxe Paint being slow. A HAM image is no slower than an EHB image, it’s the same amount of bytes.