3 ms·
> It would be no more "open" than AMP is; even if protocols and specifications are open that's irrelevant if there's a de-facto central source. I don't underst
by scrollaway 7y ago
> It would be no more "open" than AMP is; even if protocols and specifications are open that's irrelevant if there's a de-facto central source.
I don't understand that definition. Following the logic, Mozilla isn't open.