3 ms·
Can't reproduce the findings. I think this is counting all lines ever added across all commits. The current source tree is at 500k lines of C: $ tokei C: 49200
by archseer 7y ago
Can't reproduce the findings. I think this is counting all lines ever added across all commits. The current source tree is at 500k lines of C:
$ tokei
C: 492003, C Header: 58547
Total line count at 889658, "code" count at 716316, but 202314 of that is plain text which could signify documentation. It's still a lot, but not even nearly close the headline.
- ming13 7y agoInteresting. cloc counted even less — 360K of C code, 35K of headers — on the current master. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Language files blank comment code -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C 937 106426 22822 362913 XML 308 12090 455 63485 C/C++ Header 636 10009 13197 35346 Python 26 1409 6695 16629 PO File 29 3842 4158 11713
- Denvercoder9 7y agoIf you add blank+comment+code, you get remarkably close to the results of the parent comment.
- phoronixrly 7y agoI've noticed a trend on Phoronix -- most articles and especially articles on controversial topics (systemd, BSDs, pulseaudio, etc.) are very low effort. Like literally pasting a few images from GitStats (like this case), quoting a mailing list entry with no context, or running your standard desktop test suite and issuing a performance verdict based on it... Seems to me like the main purpose for such articles is not to inform, but to generate clicks by having a controversial project in its title...
- archseer 7y agoIt's bad journalism. /r/linux for example has a blanket ban on Phoronix articles and classifies them as blog spam. Most of the "announcement" type articles are mailing list quotes without context that don't link to the original source, but link to even more Phoronix articles.