I was not, and am not, engaging you on the subject of whether humans contribute to climate change. My point was entirely around a particular fallacy in your ar

I was not, and am not, engaging you on the subject of whether humans contribute to climate change. My point was entirely around a particular fallacy in your argument, and the tone. My goal was not to suggest you are wrong, but to suggest that both you and HN would benefit from a different style of discussion. If you would like some solace, here’s something: A fallacious argument does not prove its point, but equally, a fallacious argument does not disprove its point either. So when someone points out a fallacy in your argument, do not take it as saying you are wrong. They are only saying that the particular argument you are using is not logically persuasive. Having made my points, I do not need another turn. Carry on as you will.