2 ms·
put it in wikipedia, get a few blogger pals to reference (preferrably with the definition tags) it in their blogs, and use it in daily conversation and you have
by noodle 18y ago
put it in wikipedia, get a few blogger pals to reference (preferrably with the definition tags) it in their blogs, and use it in daily conversation and you have yourself a number.
- rms 18y agoa couple blogs aren't enough for Wikipedia, you need a mainstream media hit... know any local newspaper writers?
- noodle 18y agoget a decent handful of blogs together. the point would be to get the definition to show up in google's define, here: http://www.google.com/search?&q=define%3AQuadrupillion http://www.google.com/search?&q=define%3AQuadrupillion i think you could make a case to insert it into wikipedia if you can get on that page, and it probably isn't that hard to do if you set your mind to it :)
- rms 18y agoI'm an extreme Wikipedia inclusionist, but unfortunately that is not the rule on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability
- xlnt 18y agoYeah, hard disk space is cheap. excluding stuff is dumb. if you want visitors to find high quality articles then make the search box work well. google doesn't exclude webpages for lack of notability. their bar is low and they make up for it by knowing which things are more or less notable.
- hugh 18y agoActually, if you start making pages for every not-particularly-interesting integer on the order of a googolplex, you'll quickly find out that hard disk space isn't cheap any more.
- hugh 18y agoWhy don't all the extreme wikipedia inclusionists start their own, more inclusive, wiki? One with a page for every random idea that anybody's six-year-old kid ever has? I'm serious.