3 ms·
So you argument is pointing to someone who disagrees with him? Someone like Krugman who repeatedly have been wrong on almost anything. Why don't you point to s
by ThomPete 7y ago
So you argument is pointing to someone who disagrees with him? Someone like Krugman who repeatedly have been wrong on almost anything.
Why don't you point to something Navaro has been wrong about in the context of this discussion.
Despite the trade war, the economy is doing great so it's a little puzzling where you get your certainty about their inability to do this when they've actually proved you wrong.
- mikeyouse 7y agoI did point to something Navarro was wrong about, e.g. his insistence that reducing imports would increase GDP, a mistake that a 1st year econ grad student wouldn't make. But as I've said about 4 times, I'm not trying to argue with you as I'm not an international trade expert, which is why I referred to a bunch of people who are, with my own personal anecdote of this trade war bankrupting a family member's business. Maybe take a less confrontational tone though, it's pretty obnoxious.
- ThomPete 7y agoSorry but you seem to be the one with the strong language calling people cranks. The point was China though and it's ok if you don't feel you are in a position to talk about that but then you don't really have a base for knowing whether they make sense or not.