3 ms·
There were numerous bikeshed debates about naming early on in Redux's development, and the decision was made to keep using Flux-related terminology because that
by acemarke 7y ago
There were numerous bikeshed debates about naming early on in Redux's development, and the decision was made to keep using Flux-related terminology because that's what folks at the time would be familiar with:
- https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/137 https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/137
- https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/351 https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/351
- https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/891 https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/891
- hitekker 7y agoYour first link actually shows Dan deciding that the flux-based "store" name should be changed to the JS-based "reducers". Any reason why Dan isn't contributing to your new special toolkit, by the way?
- acemarke 7y agoDan stopped actively maintaining Redux in the summer of 2016, when he handed the keys to myself and Tim Dorr. This coincided with him working full-time on React. He's occasionally dropped by to comment in an issue and leave an opinion (such as when he suggested we drop `useActions` from the React-Redux hooks alpha), but he no longer does any work around Redux.