4 ms·

If that's what you consider ineffective, then what do you consider effective? There is no single source of GHGs higher than 29%, so if that's ineffective, then

If that's what you consider ineffective, then what do you consider effective? There is no single source of GHGs higher than 29%, so if that's ineffective, then every intervention is ineffective.

kortilla 7y ago
Where did I say it was ineffective? Hmmmmmmm? Vehicles are not a single source, they are millions upon millions of single sources and replacing the entire fleet will take decades even with subsidies. Also, you need to read my comment more closely. The most important part for any of this EV stuff to matter is getting all electricity generation switched to carbon free. The current left-wing thinking in the US is “no nuclear” so EVs will be powered by GHG sources until that changes (or there is some unforeseen breakthrough in battery technology there is not yet evidence or theory of). EVs are necessary but not sufficient. Without the generation change they are now just natural gas/coal fired vehicles.