Although it's not mentioned in the article, I quite like the term 'kill-free meat'[0], since it succinctly highlights the fact that live animal farming is requi

Although it's not mentioned in the article, I quite like the term 'kill-free meat'[0], since it succinctly highlights the fact that live animal farming is required for historic meat products (leading to cruelty and environmental impacts). Also from a 'word security' point of view it'd be tricky for entrenched historic meat producers to wriggle into that category without genuinely changing their practices. It may not be completely 'comforting' as a term for consumers, but I think if the pricing of equivalent items were similar, it would be difficult to argue for non-kill-free meat during dinner table discussions, and it certainly highlights the difference in a way that any member of the family regardless of age or opinions can understand. [0] - https://christian-watson.com/kill-free-meat/ https://christian-watson.com/kill-free-meat/