3 ms·
> But a platform of “we’re going to make taxes painful so the government is afraid to raise taxes” gets a lot of votes. I've never heard anyone promoting the i
by everdev 7y ago
> But a platform of “we’re going to make taxes painful so the government is afraid to raise taxes” gets a lot of votes.
I've never heard anyone promoting the idea of keeping taxes complicated to avoid higher taxes.
There's nothing inherent in complicated taxes that stops the government from raising rates.
Conservatives have long wanted the flat tax (file taxes on the back of a postcard) and lower taxes, so simpler lower taxes.
I think the reason it became so complicated was because businesses lobbied for special rules and tax breaks that made things complicated in the first place. Businesses are now setup to take advantage of these loopholes (Amazon passing $0 in taxes, etc.).
TurboTax was built as a result of complicated taxes and they lobby heavily against a simplified tax code.
It's not some cabal of citizens wanting to keep taxes complicated, it's the industries that benefit from the current tax code that wants to keep it this way.
- harryh 7y agoCorporate tax policy has no impact on the complexity of individual taxes. It's two completely independent sets of rules. Your theory is wrong.
- awb 7y agoTax deductions for retirement, mortgages, etc. are tax code complexity that benefit the financial and real estate industries. Even if it could be done simpler, TurboTax and other tax prep companies will lobby against it. You'd be hard pressed to find any government financial policy that isn't tied to business interests. The tax code is no exception.
- harryh 7y agoOK sure, there are some tenuous connections, but none of that has anything to do with "Amazon passing $0 in taxes."