I can't find anything in the text to support the unchecked praise for all pre-modern buildings you claim to be there. The best the text provides is the asserti

I can't find anything in the text to support the unchecked praise for all pre-modern buildings you claim to be there. The best the text provides is the assertion that "the pre-modern architectural language could be easily learned" and so even those of modest talents could make good buildings. Hardly the claim of inherent pleasure in the pre-modern form you say is there! The idea that there is anything straightforwardly natural about any building endowed with architecture is not very well thought throught. That or the sympthom of astonishingly poor comprehension of geology and ecology.