3 ms·
I think this is inherently due to Windows registry and no enforced standards for Windows file system. In Linux, packages are generally reviewed to ensure they f
by techntoke 7y ago
I think this is inherently due to Windows registry and no enforced standards for Windows file system. In Linux, packages are generally reviewed to ensure they follow a set of practices to ensure that they use the appropriate directories. Then they simply have to extract the files/folders to install the application, and removing is as simple as deleting those directories/files. In Windows, you really never know what you're going to get when you run an install. You might get 1k registry keys created, and it is near impossible to monitor and replicate. They might install the App in Program Files, or if it is new Appx package it will be somewhere completely different. Some apps may install in AppData. It is completely unpredictable. Running an uninstall may call msiexec, or some other uninstaller.
In order for Windows to have a Linux like package manager, they would have to re-define the install process completely to act like Linux and probably move away from the Windows Registry completely.
- hota_mazi 7y agoI'll take the Windows Registry over an OS that litters my home directory with dot files, or even simply force me to create my own format of saving my settings (even ~/.settings is barely an improvement). Saving your settings should be an API offered by the OS and the Windows Registry is pretty good at that.
- _-david-_ 7y agoHave you looked in a Windows user's home directory?
- hota_mazi 7y agoWhat does this question have to do with the existence of the Windows Registry API?
- oceanswave 7y agoBecause you said that you’d take an OS with a registry over one with dotfiles, and his point is that these days you have both