> Lots of smart juniors write code that abuses complex language features in noncanonical ways that confuse all of the people. Do you really see people do this

> Lots of smart juniors write code that abuses complex language features in noncanonical ways that confuse all of the people. Do you really see people do this in Haskell? I'm "junioring" my way through a problem set now (advent of code) and that does not describe my solutions at all. It is definitely not pro-level Haskell. I use direct recursion with an accumulator when I know there's gotta be some recursion scheme that fits the bill, very simple types, very few advanced combinators and symbols, etc. It definitely could be better, but it suffers from a lack of fanciness rather than an excess. I've peeked at some expert solutions posted online and they are neat and super impressive... but by and large they confuse the shit out of me. I have a hard time picturing being overly ambitious as a common beginner flaw in this space.