Just thought, I would put this here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_controversies https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_contro

Just thought, I would put this here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_controversies https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_controver... https://theduran.com/the-washington-post-admits-that-its-fake-news-story-was-in-fact-fake-news/ https://theduran.com/the-washington-post-admits-that-its-fak... https://www.rt.com/usa/369598-washington-post-fake-propaganda/ https://www.rt.com/usa/369598-washington-post-fake-propagand... https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/washington-post-fake-news-passports-media-bias/ https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/washington-pos... Search engines are progressively getting worse or I am finally becoming an old boomer. I can't search anything without being bombarded with amp links focused on something completely unrelated. I tried duckduckgo, yes it is better but still not comparable to the results I was getting back. If anything's a good metric for "propaganda or fake news", it's that they all use amp.