3 ms·
I think you entirely ignored the performance cost of dynamism (not having types known, not having value types, dynamic binding of methods etc..) that is handy 1
by terminaljunkid 7y ago
I think you entirely ignored the performance cost of dynamism (not having types known, not having value types, dynamic binding of methods etc..) that is handy 1% of the time but imposes type safety & performance cost other 99% of the time..