3 ms·
Title doesn't match the article and contradicts the article's contents. The article talks about using unikernels with containers, not instead of them. BTW, I k
by atq2119 7y ago
Title doesn't match the article and contradicts the article's contents. The article talks about using unikernels with containers, not instead of them.
BTW, I kind of assume they mean running unikernels inside containers as opposed to running containers on unikernels. The article seems a bit self-contradictory about that.
- eyberg 7y agoIBM/redhat have a few unikernel related projects going on and I'm guessing this is referring to nabla containers (or he might be aware of ukl). The only reason to stuff an unikernel into a container is to make the transition easier for k8s/container holdouts. You'll take a perf hit and still be stuck with all the security problems containers have. Other than that at least in my incredibly biased opinion it makes no sense.
- Matthias247 7y agoQuote from the article: > At the same time, many containers in the years ahead will be deployed on unikernel systems, says Ferris I however can't see how this would make sense.