4 ms·
I guess the fundamental challenge with a snapcast setup is that you’re provisioning a computer for each node, and the inherent burden in setup and maintenance t
by schrijver 7y ago
I guess the fundamental challenge with a snapcast setup is that you’re provisioning a computer for each node, and the inherent burden in setup and maintenance that comes with this.
My personal little wireless setup is not with an FM-transmitter (although that’s pretty elegant!), but I do try to keep some of the analog simplicity. I use these:
https://audioengineusa.com/shop/adapters/w3-wireless-audio-adapter/ https://audioengineusa.com/shop/adapters/w3-wireless-audio-a...
The sending dongle can function as a USB sound card connected to a computer, but you can also have it transmit an analog signal from its aux in. That makes for the most flexible solution: instead of connecting it to your computer, you can connect it to the pre-out of a hi-fi amp/receiver, and then anything playing on the amp will also be wirelessly transmitted. I’ve personally connected the sending dongle to a mixing desk in the living room. Latency is low, setup is minimal, and compression is lossless.
It’s super rudimentary though, the relative volume of the speakers you have to deal with on the speakers themselves, but its simplicity also makes for less problems. It’s a proprietary protocol but since it’s just something I plug into analog equipment and could replace, the vendor lock-in seems minimal.