Funny ad hominem by assocation there on NBER. If I'm parsing that right, they claim the paper is wrong because the place it was published has funders that they

Funny ad hominem by assocation there on NBER. If I'm parsing that right, they claim the paper is wrong because the place it was published has funders that they don't like? https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/22/understanding-the-nber/ https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/22/understanding-t... Even Krugman, hardly someone that can be accused of conservative bias, agrees that NBER is basically neutral.