4 ms·
Sometimes a "public reference" is part of an enterprise's contractual negotiation. They can then use this (Tim Cook's visit + quote) to garner future sales.
by utopian3 7y ago
Sometimes a "public reference" is part of an enterprise's contractual negotiation. They can then use this (Tim Cook's visit + quote) to garner future sales.
- saagarjha 7y agoTim Cook is a very private person, and he puts a lot of work into maintaining his public persona. Every word that he says publicly is vetted and checked to make sure that it aligns with his and Apple’s position on whatever the relevant topics might be. I doubt that a small supplier in Japan would make them reconsider that policy.
- catalogia 7y agoWhat makes you think such a contractually agreed upon tweet wouldn't be "vetted and checked"?
- saagarjha 7y agoI’m saying that Tim Cook doesn’t just tweet things because a small supplier tells him to. It’s because it’s something nice that fits in with what Apple would like to say on a certain topic.
- catalogia 7y agoSuppose the small supplier is supplying 'something nice that fits in with what Apple would like to say on a certain topic.'
- Klonoar 7y agoUhhhhh... no. Having worked with Apple in Japan directly (not just engineering related work, but having worked with former Apple Japan execs), I can tell you that the relationships they hold with companies over there are valued internally. It's part of the culture, for better or for worse. I can't state for certain whether it matters in the context of Cook's Tweet, but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest either. Don't be so quick to cast it aside. ;P
- saagarjha 7y agoOf course they are, I’m not saying they’re not. But that doesn’t mean Tim Cook doesn’t have a reason behind his tweets. (Note that I’m not saying this is a bad thing; it’s just that if they have anything to do with Apple they always align with something that the company would like to comment on, be it education or the environment or immigration policy.)
- jjeaff 7y agoI see no reason a tweet like that couldn't be a mutually beneficial one. Seiko gets the shout-out and in exchange apple gets a better deal and also telegraphs a little tidbit that shows thought and quality that go into Apple products.
- utopian3 7y agoThis doesn't conflict with what I said. A public reference is something he can approve, and sure, he can tweet his own words.