This may be a problem of what's idiomatic in each language, as opposed to a matter of language design per se. It's absolutely a matter of language design. Agai

This may be a problem of what's idiomatic in each language, as opposed to a matter of language design per se. It's absolutely a matter of language design. Again, I'm not criticizing Rust, but a language explicitly designed to be trivially written by anyone, fast, is going to be easier to write in quickly by anyone. Imagine making that comment about Logo instead of Go. Of course Logo is more painless to write than Rust! It's a child's language. So is Go! Rust development can't be made as easy as Swift (and it is very unlikely that what you described would be faster than Go). Even Graydon Hoare agrees that Rust is inadequate in comparison to Swift in terms of development ease: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/7qels2/i_wonder_why_graydon_hoare_the_author_of_rust/dsqeh1d/ https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/7qels2/i_wonder_why_g... I'm no stranger to languages with vastly different idioms than normal (I write APL daily), but not all languages are as quick to develop in as every other, and pretending they are is silly. Rust has some innovations, and it's by no means a bad language in itself, but pretending it wins at everything under the sun (even things it's not trying to do) doesn't reflect reality or the perspective of the original author.