2 ms·
That's true, but I think the point is that we're stifling exploration. I was trying to come up with an example challenge that would have been the right kind of
by peterlk 7y ago
That's true, but I think the point is that we're stifling exploration. I was trying to come up with an example challenge that would have been the right kind of experiment for me. The one that came to mind is as follows:
$10 (pick any amount) of gold is dissolved in a glass is front of the student. If they can get it back, the gold is theirs.
You can provide varying amounts of information to make the task easier or harder. Grades depend on creativity, effort, and communication.
- omar_a1 7y agoSo, the 'cooler' experiments are also more dangerous, and your example is illustrative of that. I'd be hesitant to hand students a flask of aqua regia (the only acid that can dissolve gold) and tell them to go nuts. Ignoring the obvious safety issue of every student having an effervescent, volatile strong acid solution (which is tricky to handle safely even as an experienced chemist), there are a handful of incompatible chemical combinations with aqua regia that would require an immediate lab evacuation and call to the fire department. You'd need constraints and some serious vetting of the students' plans before you could let them touch the stuff. I like the idea of open-ended experiments, but technique is so crucial to these things that even if they're right in theory, in practice they'd often get a negative result because of technical shortcomings of their technique. This is why you end up with cookbook experiments