3 ms·

Then these articles saying scientists are "Against statistical significance" are misleading. It sounds like scientists are more pro statistical significance tha

Then these articles saying scientists are "Against statistical significance" are misleading. It sounds like scientists are more pro statistical significance than ever, so much so that they want it to be defined and interpreted correctly. I guess many people would benefit from taking a high school statistics class.

scarejunba 7y ago
Well, in isolation p is problematic. For instance, without hypothesis pre-registration you have the obvious problem with negative results and publication bias.