3 ms·
Unless you can call someone who brings you food, clothing and book a living space. Oh and have a chat. (Of course very little is free.) It does not satisfy nee
by AstralStorm 7y ago
Unless you can call someone who brings you food, clothing and book a living space. Oh and have a chat.
(Of course very little is free.)
It does not satisfy needs directly, but it is first order interacting with them.
Now, without means you cannot satisfy anything. Food is means too, as is house, these are directly satisfying a need. Communication can only maybe directly satisfy the high level needs. (Belonging and up.)
- dredmorbius 7y agoYou seem to be trying to assert disagreement by agreeing with me. The question isn't whether or not a comms device can be an adjunct to accessing necessities of existence. I've already specifically addressed that. It's whether or not it is a substitute for that access, as @lotsofpulp impliedly asserted.