3 ms·
> I would consider paid ads, paid likes, paid comments, etc., to be unethical if the content they're supporting is false. That's not a very useful statement. W
by reroute1 7y ago
> I would consider paid ads, paid likes, paid comments, etc., to be unethical if the content they're supporting is false.
That's not a very useful statement. What if it's in support of an opinion? Advertisements are rarely just a list of facts and likes
> TLDR: What's the difference between paying Facebook/Google/etc for an ad vs paying someone else to like your post? The 2nd seems like a better solution for a majority of people.
The difference is pretty clear, one is purchasing a real ad on a real platform. The other is paying for fake interactions to project a false response to something.
- mattferderer 7y agoDon't know why you were downvoted but... > What if it's in support of an opinion? I think opinions are great if they state their claims and reasons in a respectful manner and don't throw out very false narratives on purpose. > ...real ad on a real platform. The other is paying for fake interactions to project a false response.. You're right. I'm jaded and feel I'm over advertised to on search engines, blogs & social media platforms. I feel they're shoved down your throat & ruin the quality of the platform. I feel a lot of ads or "sponsored posts" try their hardest to hide the fact that it's an ad. They often blur the lines of accurate claims. I don't even need to go down the route of "influencer" or "affiliate links" that hide it even more. At one time in my life, I felt there was a clear distinction between ads & authentic word of mouth promotion of an item. That was probably way back when TV blurred out logos. I haven't felt that way in a long time. I believe "real ad" is such a gray area these days that I am having a hard time seeing anything wrong with regular people making money off this advertisement hysteria instead of companies. Especially since most of the companies in question here are doing highly unethical things with their user's data. You can take the above paragraph & state 2 wrongs don't make a right or point out several fallacies made. At the end I would argue that the paid likes are only a small part of a larger problem of advertisements. Yes I would like to see paid likes become irrelevant but I think there are bigger issues.
- wolco 7y agoAn ad is a message designed to force the user to hear a certain message. Hopefully invoke associations to other real things. A real ad is the same as a fake ad. They are all just ads. It doesn't matter who you pay. They do the same thing.
- reroute1 7y ago> A real ad is the same as a fake ad. We're talking about fake likes. An ad without purchased likes is clearly not the same as an ad with purchased likes. One has a genuine representation of response and the other does not. Who you pay does matter as one is a legitimate ad and the other is at worst posing as a legitimate ad, but possibly also a real ad that has been given inflated numbers via purchased likes. One is trying to operate within the system, the other is trying to game it. Not the same thing and who you pay obviously does matter. Just because they may have a similar purpose doesn't make them the same... That is actually one of the interesting things about social media as a political platform. This wasn't possible at the same level with television or radio advertising because of the fact that "posts" and "likes" are often by essentially complete anonymous strangers online. The troll farm levels being what they currently are I think people would do well to take all numbers and advertisements they see online with a grain of salt until these issues are more settled.