3 ms·
>If there are systemic social biases against groups with genetic genes the impacts of these will be 100% explained by the presence of these genes That makes se
by jffhn 7y ago
>If there are systemic social biases against groups with genetic genes the impacts of these will be 100% explained by the presence of these genes
That makes sense, but according to Plomin there's also an opposite (and counterintuitive to most people) effect, which over time increases the influence of genetics over the influence of the environment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lev8dGnxvdw&t=4m43s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lev8dGnxvdw&t=4m43s
- jffhn 7y agoRecursing on my post: Plomin might make sense as well, but according to Nassim N. Taleb not always: "Plomin who studies heredity doesn’t seem aware of the intransitivity of correlation." (he made a whole paper about these correlation issues: https://www.academia.edu/39797871/Common_Misapplications_and_Misinterpretations_of_Correlation_in_Social_Science_ https://www.academia.edu/39797871/Common_Misapplications_and...)