3 ms·
There's certainly evidence of bias in climate science, but if anything it's been towards understating the effect [1] [1] https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/o
by jajag 7y ago
There's certainly evidence of bias in climate science, but if anything it's been towards understating the effect [1]
[1] https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/scientists-have-been-underestimating-the-pace-of-climate-change/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/scientists...
- LoSboccacc 7y agoaccording to climate predictions we'd be underwater today in pescara but they would have not be an issue as we would also have dief of all the cancer from the ozone layer depletion. change is real, damn this winter we got 15+ degree Celsius instead of the ten cm snow we usually got when I was a kid, the local effects are quite evident, and the trajectory spells real dangers, but past predictions were definitely overstating the effects, no wonder people have doubts about current predictions
- morsch 7y agoYou mention the ozone layer depletion as evidence of past exaggeration when in fact it's evidence of how a concerted, international effort can deal with an environmental issue.
- LoSboccacc 7y agohere the thing: these are both true, by definition, states reacted and people didn't cook up. but people only see what resonates with their belief and immediately attak anyone poking at the notion that it'll happen again for co2, despite all the evidences from the past