3 ms·

If you didn't have reliable IDE support while developing python then you didn't use a good IDE or the code you were working with had too much dynamic voodoo non

by zo1 7y ago

If you didn't have reliable IDE support while developing python then you didn't use a good IDE or the code you were working with had too much dynamic voodoo nonsense. One must never go "full dynamic", because you then get the worst of both worlds. I've generally had reliable IDE support for python for almost a decade now. First in the form of PyDev on Eclipse, and now PyCharm.

pkolaczk 7y ago
IMHO PyCharm is good among dynamic languages, but it's still far from the level of IDE support you get for statically typed languages. It is very conservative in the number of bugs it highlights. Same problem in VSCode and JS. While autocomplete is quite nice and works most of the times, they fail to catch most problems when I type.