4 ms·
So that's why this doesn't make sense to you. You're refusing to think like an investor, only like an employee. Comparing one field to another field from the pe
by yowlingcat 7y ago
So that's why this doesn't make sense to you. You're refusing to think like an investor, only like an employee. Comparing one field to another field from the perspective of a laborer is useless, because the job and career only exists in context of the business itself. Until you can talk about investibility, this will remain a mystery to you. You've unintentionally demonstrated the difference between a programmer and a product savvy software engineer.
To try to end this on a bit more of a constructive note: think about the difference between the _firms_ that employ software engineers/marketers/salespeople and the _firms_ that employ highly paid folks in medicine and law. How do the unit economics breakdown? In what ways are certain aspects favorable and unfavorable to an investor?
- shishy 7y agoI'd always thought it was because the marginal cost of a developer is 0, right? That is, developers build software, then they go to work on the next thing while company can sell existing software. Each additional unit of software sale doesn't have a developer cost component (unlike for example, shoes, where the labor cost of the worker is factored into making each additional shoe). Is that close to what you're saying?