3 ms·

All of my software is either ISC or GPLv3. Source code links are available on all of my download pages. I've had to remove the pre-compiled binaries for users.

by near 7y ago

All of my software is either ISC or GPLv3. Source code links are available on all of my download pages. I've had to remove the pre-compiled binaries for users. Both Microsoft and Apple ban my specific class of software (emulators) in spite of unanimous court rulings establishing them as legal under fair use laws.

gdm85 7y ago
Have you considered releasing the binaries as releases on GitLab or GitHub? That's at least how I would try to work around the issue. Regarding the blog post: I think this is a side effect of making the web a "safer" place for all kinds of users; nothing which I appreciate personally but I understand why a large mass of users clicking everything is a concern for Google/Microsoft/Apple. I was once thinking that people could be educated to use the web in a better and safer way...now I think everyone (tech-savy users, big corporations) has given up on that and that "safe by default" is the norm.
- near 7y ago
  I have, some comments here suggest those pages get flagged as well. It does me no good if I move to a GitHub page that gets blocked, and I would also have to deal with some sites choosing to link to GitHub directly, which would bypass the work I put into my site on documentation, tutorials, etc.
  - gdm85 7y ago
    > a GitHub page that gets blocked I have never seen this happening, but if you come around proof of this please share the information. Edit: this is the proof: https://twitter.com/notdan/status/1209642463859630081 https://twitter.com/notdan/status/1209642463859630081 They fixed it afterwards. > some sites choosing to link to GitHub directly They can link directly to the download on your site to the same effect?
cycloptic 7y ago
Yes, emulators are legal, and you can use them to play homebrew that is FOSS, but the majority of people seem to use them to play non-free ROMs which are often obtained illegally. They are useless to most without these additional non-free binaries. The major software distributors understandably want nothing to do with this. And I'm saying this as a big fan of your work. I consider having working references in software for all those old chips to be important -- but I doubt anyone else has bothered to collect every single retro game cart in existence just to dump them and say they could play them legally on bsnes.

by near 7y ago

gdm85 7y ago

Have you considered releasing the binaries as releases on GitLab or GitHub? That's at least how I would try to work around the issue. Regarding the blog post: I think this is a side effect of making the web a "safer" place for all kinds of users; nothing which I appreciate personally but I understand why a large mass of users clicking everything is a concern for Google/Microsoft/Apple. I was once thinking that people could be educated to use the web in a better and safer way...now I think everyone (tech-savy users, big corporations) has given up on that and that "safe by default" is the norm.

near 7y ago
I have, some comments here suggest those pages get flagged as well. It does me no good if I move to a GitHub page that gets blocked, and I would also have to deal with some sites choosing to link to GitHub directly, which would bypass the work I put into my site on documentation, tutorials, etc.
- gdm85 7y ago
  > a GitHub page that gets blocked I have never seen this happening, but if you come around proof of this please share the information. Edit: this is the proof: https://twitter.com/notdan/status/1209642463859630081 https://twitter.com/notdan/status/1209642463859630081 They fixed it afterwards. > some sites choosing to link to GitHub directly They can link directly to the download on your site to the same effect?

cycloptic 7y ago

Yes, emulators are legal, and you can use them to play homebrew that is FOSS, but the majority of people seem to use them to play non-free ROMs which are often obtained illegally. They are useless to most without these additional non-free binaries. The major software distributors understandably want nothing to do with this. And I'm saying this as a big fan of your work. I consider having working references in software for all those old chips to be important -- but I doubt anyone else has bothered to collect every single retro game cart in existence just to dump them and say they could play them legally on bsnes.