4 ms·
He could just add the windows binary to the github releases[0] and link to that though. I'm not sure if linking directly to the binary will cause similar proble
by iruoy 7y ago
He could just add the windows binary to the github releases[0] and link to that though. I'm not sure if linking directly to the binary will cause similar problems, but he can at least publish the binary and link to the latest release.
[0]: https://github.com/byuu/bsnes/releases https://github.com/byuu/bsnes/releases
- near 7y agoIf it happens to flag my GitHub page, I'm not really in a better position as far as being able to distribute my software goes. It would also be problematic if other sites began linking to my releases page instead of my official page which also includes documentation, screenshots, feature lists, etc. If I can get a confirmation from someone at Google that they will trust GitHub download links more, then I'm willing to go this route for now.
- gdm85 7y agoFrom my experience this works fine (using links to GitHub downloads), see also my other reply. They don't give score to "GitHub accounts" but they use some form of score/accountability based on the domain. As far as I know the main vector they are trying to protect users against are emails with links to binary files hosted on random hacked servers.
- ameshkov 7y agoGoogle is able to block Github repos as well. Just a few days ago it happened to https://github.com/beefproject/beef https://github.com/beefproject/beef