3 ms·
> (something the people behind Matrix actually admit in some of their internal talks) Actually, we've been quite clear publicly that Matrix's initial incarnati
by Arathorn 7y ago
> (something the people behind Matrix actually admit in some of their internal talks)
Actually, we've been quite clear publicly that Matrix's initial incarnation didn't try to deal with metadata privacy, e.g. this presentation taken from a 2015 talk at the Jardin Entropique cryptography conference in Rennes: https://matrix.org/~matthew/2016-12-22%20Matrix%20Balancing%20Interop%20and%20Privacy.pdf https://matrix.org/~matthew/2016-12-22%20Matrix%20Balancing%...
The fun thing is these days we've got to the point of building out metadata-preserving federation transports in Matrix (I just spent the Christmas break working on the stuff outlined in https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/event/dip_p2p_matrix/ https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/event/dip_p2p_matrix/).
It feels like we (as Matrix) should do a formal response to moxie's "ecosystem is moving" stuff at some point, not least because the original blog post was written in response to me mailing him to consider linking Signal into Matrix :/
- glogla 7y ago> It feels like we (as Matrix) should do a formal response to moxie's "ecosystem is moving" stuff at some point, not least because the original blog post was written in response to me mailing him to consider linking Signal into Matrix :/ Moxie doesn't want to share, does he?
- dvdgsng 7y ago> It feels like we (as Matrix) should do a formal response please do!
- Arathorn 7y agohttps://matrix.org/blog/2020/02/01/on-privacy-versus-freedom/ https://matrix.org/blog/2020/02/01/on-privacy-versus-freedom...