4 ms·
The only actual reason I have heard is that Cybertruck makes it harder to load from the side. However I have heard why the utility of the frunk, integrated Ram
by nickik 7y ago
The only actual reason I have heard is that Cybertruck makes it harder to load from the side.
However I have heard why the utility of the frunk, integrated Ramp, the automatic cover, active suspension and so on would not make up for that.
- x3haloed 7y agoRight. You tell me which truck you'd rather load boxes and furniture into. https://www.geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/TeslaElectricATV-625x352.jpg https://www.geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/TeslaElectri...
- nickik 7y agoThe Cybertruck can go much lower then most trucks because of active suspension. So clearly the Cybertruck.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- jsight 7y agoThe issue is that the comparison is to the Rivian which only has a 4.5 ft bed. The rear 4.5 feet of the Cybertruck isn't too hard to access, its the front 2 feet that is problematic. The rivian doesn't have that feature.
- gamblor956 7y agoFor loading furniture, the rear of the Cybertruck is extremely difficult to access, because you can only access it from the rear of the vehicle.
- jsight 7y agoAgain, I was comparing to the Rivian. I'm not convinced that the sail sides on the CT are appreciably higher than the Rivian over only the rear 4.5 feet. The Rivian is not a more practical vehicle by any stretch of the imagination.