> having Proposal F be above them all But Proposal F is very clearly NOT above them all. 207 people preferred B over F, while only 185 people preferred F over

> having Proposal F be above them all But Proposal F is very clearly NOT above them all. 207 people preferred B over F, while only 185 people preferred F over B. If F were above them all, it would be the Condorcet winner and hence would have necessarily won according to the Schulze method, which it didn't. B actually is the Condorcet winner, as it would beat every single other option in a one-to-one contest. (The fact that B is the winner according to the Schulze method doesn't necessarily imply that it is the Condorcet winner, as there might not be a Condorcet winner.) F being the "most voted option" is a misleading and mostly vacuous statement. All that can be said is that more people preferred F to "further discussion" (303 vs. 110), than preferred any other option to "further discussion". In particular, only 299 vs. 111 preferred B to "further discussion". However that has no bearing whatsoever on whether people preferred F over B. (My theory for why B didn't beat "further discussion" by quite such a large margin as F did, is that in the case of B both the only-systemd "extremists" and the anti-systemd "extremists" preferred "further discussion" to B, while in the case of F only the anti-systemd "extremists" preferred "further discussion" to F.)