4 ms·
> The article's original title is much more readable than this post's title. Probably too long to fit, op did a decent job of compressing imo. The original is
by ajflores1604 7y ago
> The article's original title is much more readable than this post's title.
Probably too long to fit, op did a decent job of compressing imo.
The original is:
RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM SERIES PART 2: THE 10 CATEGORIES OF DEEP RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS THAT ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO
- kevinwang 7y agoThe “that” being left out makes it tough to parse
- 15__characters 7y agoThe "to" missing at the end totally breaks it for me, I read it as "Categories of Deep Recommendation Systems: Researchers Should Pay Attention"
- thaumasiotes 7y agoOmitting the "that" is fully standard English grammar. Omitting the "to" is not, and radically alters the meaning of the title.