This is disingenuous. https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs_purported_HIV_medical_status_results,_2008 https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs_purported_HIV_medi

This is disingenuous. https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs_purported_HIV_medical_status_results,_2008 https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs_purported_HIV_medical_... Wikileaks explicitly noted: > Due to the contradictory dates, possible evidence of forgery, strong motivations for fabrication, and few motivations for a legitimate revelation, the images should not be taken at face value. Using Wayback machine, I can confirm that this text was associated with these images from the first moment that they were published on Wikileaks. Also, HIV isn't AIDS and you should keep that in mind.