3 ms·
Faultless record? Absolutely not. They will support /r/conspiracy's lunacy at all costs as long as it somehow ties to Hillary Clinton. This one[1] was the most
by seattle_spring 7y ago
Faultless record? Absolutely not. They will support /r/conspiracy's lunacy at all costs as long as it somehow ties to Hillary Clinton. This one[1] was the most ridiculous claim they supported, but I'm sure someone who cares more could find dozens or even hundreds more claims made by WikiLeaks that are nothing more than deranged Dale Gribble-esque rants.
[1] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/san-francisco-tech-assange/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/san-francisco-tech-assange...
- aldoushuxley001 7y agoPlease never in good faith cite snopes as a reference.
- seattle_spring 7y agoWould you mind going through the contents of the article I posted from them and finding pieces of inaccuracy?
- MiroF 7y agoSorry - were the claims that David Soloff was behind T&C actually made by Wikileaks? Your link provides no evidence of that fact that I see, and from a brief perusal of the primary sources, I don't see Wikileaks ever making that claim either.
- aldoushuxley001 7y agoDisregarding the fact that Snopes is a very disreputable organization (e.g. there's a reason Facebook fired them as fact-checkers), your reference doesn't even back up what you say. Is it possible you're the one engaging in conspiracy theories?
- noname120 7y agoThe official narrative is that they withdrew from the program[1]. If you have contradicting evidence, please provide it when making such a claim. This community doesn't like broad claims without evidence. [1] https://www.snopes.com/2019/02/01/snopes-fb-partnership-ends/ https://www.snopes.com/2019/02/01/snopes-fb-partnership-ends...