4 ms·
systemd looks like it was forced somehow on distros. I was happy with sysvinit, no issues with it as a simple user on laptop. But now I have issues with systemd
by krzyk 7y ago
systemd looks like it was forced somehow on distros.
I was happy with sysvinit, no issues with it as a simple user on laptop.
But now I have issues with systemd once a month, I really hate that thing and don't see any benefits.
- majewsky 7y ago> systemd looks like it was forced somehow on distros. Distros adopted systemd because it solves a huge waste of time that distributors have to deal with: maintaining init scripts. systemd unit files are distro-agnostic and can thus be maintained upstream. (There's also other useless idiosyncrasies that systemd plowed over, so there's even less work for distributors to do. Or rather, more time to do actually interesting work to differentiate their distribution.)
- despera 7y agoPackage maintainers have far, far worse problems to deal with than some shell scripts that are trivial most of the time for alternative init systems like openRC. Also, hopefully, no maintainer in his (security-wise) right mind use upstream provided system files as-is.