My guess is that Esterel is using the word "synchronicity" for what we know as "reactive" today. Not to be confused with the "sync/async" we normally refer to b

My guess is that Esterel is using the word "synchronicity" for what we know as "reactive" today. Not to be confused with the "sync/async" we normally refer to blocking/non-blocking today. I could misunderstanding this though. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_programming_language https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_programming_langua...