I hate framing things like this as "human rights". Rights are an imaginary construct that humans created. All we need to ask is: Does it create a more effective

I hate framing things like this as "human rights". Rights are an imaginary construct that humans created. All we need to ask is: Does it create a more effective/equitable/propserous society for us if we collectively provide / subsidize this? If yes, then let's do it. If not, then let's not. No need to argue about whether it's some ineffable "right" or not, which ultimately comes down to personal philosophy.