4 ms·
I think the distinction in California was that they are trying to broaden the definition of cottage foods. The Idaho link you gave is similar to what California
by erichurkman 7y ago
I think the distinction in California was that they are trying to broaden the definition of cottage foods. The Idaho link you gave is similar to what California had before -- generally non-perishable, temperature-safe foods (bread, jam, nut mixes, etc). California has allowed those for years. The new law was an attempt to broaden what home cooks could prepare and sell.
- anfilt 7y agoI just looked at the text of the bill you mentioned and yea it does go much further. Although, it appears to allow third party websites and apps to process sales. Although such services must keep track of food safety complaints for home kitchen and if more than three report them. However, there are restrictions on who can deliver food. Aka only family members or employee of the operation. So that pretty much makes someone operating as such unable to use delivery serivces。 Although, i dont see anything stopping a bread baker or some who produces low risk food from using such services. also not legal advice.