No. That's what you're doing here. I even clearly explained why your anecdote was pointless to any argument you might want to make. It's unverifiable and simpl

No. That's what you're doing here. I even clearly explained why your anecdote was pointless to any argument you might want to make. It's unverifiable and simply an appeal to emotion. I think it's fair to question the motives of someone who would not only do that, but fail to acknowledge it when it was pointed out. You're the one labeling people as "ideologue"s and refusing to bring anything resembling a fact. It's just straight to defense of the police. With the occasional "Oh, I hate abuse too, sure" when called on it.