3 ms·

There was a big push in California over the past few years to build out regulatory structure for this. They even passed a bill [0] (NPR article) to enable it --

There was a big push in California over the past few years to build out regulatory structure for this. They even passed a bill [0] (NPR article) to enable it -- though they explicitly carved out third party delivery services. [0] https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/17/685626391/selling-food-from-your-kitchen-is-legal-in-california-but-theres-a-catch https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/17/685626391/se...

anfilt 7y ago
Honestly, more states need cottage food laws. I know Washington and Idaho, and minosotta for instance have what are called cottage food laws to allow such food. Certainly, other states I am missing, but I think that more states should have them. Less Strict (Paper work not required but recommended) https://cdhd.idaho.gov/pdfs/food/CottageFoodsFAQ.pdf https://cdhd.idaho.gov/pdfs/food/CottageFoodsFAQ.pdf Paper Work Still Required https://agr.wa.gov/departments/food-safety/food-safety/cottage-food https://agr.wa.gov/departments/food-safety/food-safety/cotta... -Edit- I do find it funny that the NPR article calls the bill "the first of its kind in the country". Washington (although much stricter than other states), and Idaho have allowed it for quite some time. Idaho even longer before being formally codified.
- erichurkman 7y ago
  I think the distinction in California was that they are trying to broaden the definition of cottage foods. The Idaho link you gave is similar to what California had before -- generally non-perishable, temperature-safe foods (bread, jam, nut mixes, etc). California has allowed those for years. The new law was an attempt to broaden what home cooks could prepare and sell.
  - anfilt 7y ago
    I just looked at the text of the bill you mentioned and yea it does go much further. Although, it appears to allow third party websites and apps to process sales. Although such services must keep track of food safety complaints for home kitchen and if more than three report them. However, there are restrictions on who can deliver food. Aka only family members or employee of the operation. So that pretty much makes someone operating as such unable to use delivery serivces。 Although, i dont see anything stopping a bread baker or some who produces low risk food from using such services. also not legal advice.

anfilt 7y ago

Honestly, more states need cottage food laws. I know Washington and Idaho, and minosotta for instance have what are called cottage food laws to allow such food. Certainly, other states I am missing, but I think that more states should have them. Less Strict (Paper work not required but recommended) https://cdhd.idaho.gov/pdfs/food/CottageFoodsFAQ.pdf https://cdhd.idaho.gov/pdfs/food/CottageFoodsFAQ.pdf Paper Work Still Required https://agr.wa.gov/departments/food-safety/food-safety/cottage-food https://agr.wa.gov/departments/food-safety/food-safety/cotta... -Edit- I do find it funny that the NPR article calls the bill "the first of its kind in the country". Washington (although much stricter than other states), and Idaho have allowed it for quite some time. Idaho even longer before being formally codified.

erichurkman 7y ago
I think the distinction in California was that they are trying to broaden the definition of cottage foods. The Idaho link you gave is similar to what California had before -- generally non-perishable, temperature-safe foods (bread, jam, nut mixes, etc). California has allowed those for years. The new law was an attempt to broaden what home cooks could prepare and sell.
- anfilt 7y ago
  I just looked at the text of the bill you mentioned and yea it does go much further. Although, it appears to allow third party websites and apps to process sales. Although such services must keep track of food safety complaints for home kitchen and if more than three report them. However, there are restrictions on who can deliver food. Aka only family members or employee of the operation. So that pretty much makes someone operating as such unable to use delivery serivces。 Although, i dont see anything stopping a bread baker or some who produces low risk food from using such services. also not legal advice.