There's a lot of numbers between 10% and 100%. A charity that donates 100% of the collected funds is one that only employs volunteers in their free time: I can

There's a lot of numbers between 10% and 100%. A charity that donates 100% of the collected funds is one that only employs volunteers in their free time: I can understand they might not be the most efficient and effective. At the same time, a charity that uses 100% of it funds in administrative costs is simply a scam. There could be two solutions: 1) a law that mandates charities to display front and center the percentage of collected funds that went to charity in the previous year; 2) a hard cap on administration costs, maybe 1/3 of the collected funds.