4 ms·
You're discussing it as a negative metric/limiting factor/base constant type of thing, but that's not the context in the article: >Thus, the "most valuable dev
by Benjammer 7y ago
You're discussing it as a negative metric/limiting factor/base constant type of thing, but that's not the context in the article:
>Thus, the "most valuable developer" as measured by LoC tends to be whoever is adding the most CSS, whitespace, and third-party libraries.
It's still as terrible as ever to positively correlate developer productivity/quality/skill with LOC.
- taeric 7y agoOf course, that developer almost certainly introduced the most bugs, as well. So, maybe? :) Though, agreed you are almost certainly better pulling back up and asking more product faced questions. The most prolific author, as an example, produced more sentences read by someone. Not just more sentences.