4 ms·
Show HN: Wall of Trolls - Naming and shaming trolls
Recently, it feels like there has been a sharp rise in the amount of trolling of new startups/products -- comments dismissing them as stupid or pointless or "just a feature," etc. So over the weekend, I whipped up walloftrolls.com, to name and shame trolls a bit. You can submit troll comments from HN and also vote on other comments posted there. If there's a lot of demand, I can add other sites too. Leave me comments below or by email (linked from the site).
- apu 16y agoClicky: http://walloftrolls.com http://walloftrolls.com
- notyourwork 16y agoSomething about that page makes me feel like the domain should contain geocities. I venture to say it has to do with the winkled paper effect along with the blue carper background. Aside from the look/feel I like the idea.
- Khao 16y agoI don't think it's useful to waste time with trolls on this site. Instead of trying to find / pursue trolls, I prefer writing constructive comments. Focus on the positive side instead of fighting against the negative side, your efforts will be more valuable.
- mindcrime 16y agoMost of those comments don't strike me as trolling at all. Just because something is negative or dismissive doesn't mean it's "troll." Sometimes it's constructive criticism, or a valid point about the likelihood of the idea being successful. Are we all so thin-skinned here that we expect - and can handle - nothing but praise, compliments and accolades for our efforts; no matter how ill-conceived they may be? Personally, if I launch a dumb startup and announce it here, I want people to say "that's f%!#ng braindead." One of two things should happen: I realize that "they" are right, shut it down, and move onto something more profitable, OR I take the criticism as a challenge, buckle down and work that much harder, and have that much more of a chance of being successful.
- brk 16y agoTwo questions: 1) Why would I go to that site? Just to see who is supposedly trolling" What is the value-add to me as a user, other than drive-by gawking? 2) Several of the comments I saw there did not seem "trollish", but were just legitimate questions about the viability or application of some projects. Not every comment is going to be unicorns and rainbows. I have seen some comments on HN that are unjustly harsh, but every criticism or negative comment is also not a "troll". The real legitimate trolls seem to get dealt with via downvotes, and I can't say that I've noticed a strong trend of any one user being an ongoing ass.
- iwwr 16y agoIsn't it completely counter-productive to feed a troll? BTW, your project looks so... web 1.0-y. Please upgrade to year 2000 design practices. That didn't work? OK, Geocities called, they want their website back :p Edit: "Error: Can't handle this url!" Apparently, submitting stories (such as this) is not possible.