3 ms·
I'm not sure I understand what your proposal is but the answer to your question of "why wealth tax", the answer is pretty much because it's simple to convey and
by helen___keller 7y ago
I'm not sure I understand what your proposal is but the answer to your question of "why wealth tax", the answer is pretty much because it's simple to convey and rally behind.
Deficit spending (or straight up "money printing") could provide benefits to those who need it without taxation, but decades of political obsession over "how are we gonna pay for it" means that people feel better if a policy of "buy X" is followed by "while taking money from Y to pay for it"
For Republicans, the Y is some nefarious unnamed government bloat or waste, but never military. Most recently it's food stamps, and as I understand it there's a lot of hungry gazes staring at social security and medicaid.
For Democrats, the Y is some nefarious wealthy entity, either Big Corporations or The Rich. So, ambitious far left proposals involve taxing wealth, adding very high marginal tax rates at the top, and taxing corporations and investment vehicles. This is often silly for obvious reasons. For example, Bernie suggests taxing stock transactions, bond trades, and derivatives transactions, by a (low) percentage, which sounds insane personally. But that stocks and derivatives sounds like Evil Wall Street Bullshit to some voters so they eat it up.
- neilwilson 7y agoBy definition if you spend more, you tax more. Every amount of govt spending is matched by an increase in taxation to the penny for any positive tax rate. The only thing that stops that is increases in private saving along the route. Why do you want to stop increased saving? The 'wealth tax' doesn't work because it doesn't stop the 'wealthy' from bidding on the thing government is trying to buy. So you are just going to cause inflation. Why not try explaining to people how the system actually works?