3 ms·
Why not? It's unlicensed, so it's a free-for-all. If we don't like that, the answer is to license it. Which doesn't seem better to me.
by akersten 7y ago
Why not? It's unlicensed, so it's a free-for-all. If we don't like that, the answer is to license it. Which doesn't seem better to me.
- gruez 7y ago>Why not? It's unlicensed, so it's a free-for-all. Unlicensed doesn't mean no rules. For example, even though 2.4 Ghz is unlicensed, you're still subject to transmission power limits. In the US at least, there's also statues against interference. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/15.5 https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/15.5 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/333 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/333
- megous 7y agoThere are still many rules to follow when using unlicensed frequency ranges. So it's not free for all, really.