> "Am I right to think computers should adopt a more parallel architecture and design, and to expand on techs like OpenCL and CUDA, and generalize those techniq

> "Am I right to think computers should adopt a more parallel architecture and design, and to expand on techs like OpenCL and CUDA, and generalize those technique to everything done by a computer, because we've hit a frequency limit?" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law "...Amdahl's law is often used in parallel computing to predict the theoretical speedup when using multiple processors. For example, if a program needs 20 hours using a single processor core, and a particular part of the program which takes one hour to execute cannot be parallelized, while the remaining 19 hours (p = 0.95) of execution time can be parallelized, then regardless of how many processors are devoted to a parallelized execution of this program, the minimum execution time cannot be less than that critical one hour. Hence, the theoretical speedup is limited to at most 20 times {\displaystyle \left({\dfrac {1}{1-p}}=20\right)}{\displaystyle \left({\dfrac {1}{1-p}}=20\right)}. For this reason, parallel computing with many processors is useful only for highly parallelizable programs..." So, in answer to your question, no.