4 ms·
Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the accuser? They're basically accusing everyone of being sexist. Even if that's true I don't see the point of it in this co
by curiousgal 7y ago
Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the accuser? They're basically accusing everyone of being sexist. Even if that's true I don't see the point of it in this context, all of the charities are struggling.
I guess the men got the short end of that stick since they can't blame it on others./s
- smt88 7y ago> Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the accuser? They're basically accusing everyone of being sexist. The accusation is milder and more general than you imply. They suggest they have a harder time raising money on average than a male company. Perhaps that means only 10% of people have a bias (which is not the same as sexism). That's much easier to believe than that 100% of people are consciously sexist. > Even if that's true I don't see the point of it in this context, all of the charities are struggling. Perhaps just to vent.