2 ms·
That seems a defensible definition, but also at odds with your usage: > More advanced languages should not be forced to deal with it (I'm more in agreement wi
by smitty1e 7y ago
That seems a defensible definition, but also at odds with your usage:
> More advanced languages should not be forced to deal with it
(I'm more in agreement with the definition you offer than your usage.)
- dbtx 7y agoJust a tick-- the quoted usage and the definition appear to be from two different people.